OK.......ANWAR IBRAHIM CAN GIVE HIS DNA SAMPLE. SO WHAT THEN?? COULD PROSECUTION PROVE THAT THIS DNA IS SIMILAR TO THE DNA SAMPLES FOUND IN ........WHERE, WHEN, WHO, WHICH AND HOW??

OK.......ANWAR IBRAHIM CAN GIVE HIS DNA SAMPLE. SO WHAT THEN?? COULD PROSECUTION PROVE THAT THIS DNA IS SIMILAR TO THE DNA SAMPLES FOUND IN ........WHERE, WHEN, WHO, WHICH AND HOW?? IF THERE WAS ANY IN SAIFUL’S ANUS, THE PROTEIN-BASED GELATINE-LIKE SUBSTANCE COULD HAVE BEEN FERMENTED AFTER A FEW DAYS.........ANYWAY, why the prosecution is still looking for evidence at this late stage, when it should already have had sufficient evidence to allow it to charge Anwar in the first place?...WHAT THEY CALL IT LEGALLY??? PRIMA FACIE CASE??? SINCE THE PROSECUTION SIDE LACKS EVIDENCE, THE WHOLE CHARGE AGAINSTS ANWAR SHOULD BE THROWN OUT......SORRY, I'M NOT A LAWYER, I COULD BE WRONG!!


Tomorrow, Monday, 14th March 2011, the Prosecution wants the court to decide whether it can force Anwar Ibrahim to give his DNA sample. Will the action succeed and will Anwar have to comply to the court ruling? What is the Prosecution's argument in its attempt to convince the court that it should compel Anwar to provide his DNA sample? Well, read the 14-page document below. This will throw some light on the matter that may decide whether Anwar will spend the rest of his life in jail.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Prosecution completes case, seeks Anwar’s DNA sample

(Bernama) - The High Court ordered the prosecution and defence in the Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sodomy trial to make submissions on Monday, March 14 on two prosecution applications, one of which is to order Anwar to provide a DNA sample.

Justice Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah gave the order on Friday, March 11 after the head of the prosecution, Solicitor-General Datuk Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abiden, made the applications at the end of the prosecution's case.

One of the applications was for the court to use its powers under the Evidence Act 1950 to compel Anwar to provide a DNA sample for analysis. The other was to review the decision of the court not to allow three items to be tendered as exhibits following a trial-within-a-trial.

Anwar's lawyer Karpal Singh objected to the prosecution's applications.

Anwar, 63, Parti Keadilan Rakyat advisor and Permatang Pauh MP, has claimed trial to performing carnal intercourse against the order of nature on his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan at a condominium unit in Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, on June 26, 2008.

Mohamed Yusof said the application for the DNA sample was in accordance with sections 73 and 165 of the Evidence Act, and arose following the testimony of witnesses, particularly chemist Dr Seah Lay Hong, who confirmed the presence of several DNA profiles in the anus of Mohd Saiful.

"The application is made to seek the truth and justice for all quarters," he said.

He also applied for the court to review the decision of Justice Mohamad Zabidin at the end of a trial-within-a-trial pertaining to the admissibility of three items as exhibits.

The judge had ruled that a toothbrush, towel and mineral water bottle taken from the lockup where Anwar was kept overnight were obtained by unfair means and therefore should be excluded from the trial.

Mohamed Yusof argued that the warrant for the arrest of Anwar had been admitted as an exhibit after the trial-within-a-trial.

Comments (18)...

written by AlwaysFair, March 13, 2011 14:40:52

If Anwar gets convicted in spite of over-whelming evidences to the contrary then the whole judiary gets indicted too for being biased and compromised and CORRUPT. ..

written by batsman, March 13, 2011 14:33:43

The court is being used to order something illegal before the charge to make it legal after the charge. This means the court is being used to break or circumvent the law. This is Malaysian law at its best - full of manipulation, lies, crooked officials and fraudulent accusations. ..

written by michatan2000, March 13, 2011 12:28:09

Not just Rosmah, Najib and Co., it's actually Mahathir, Rosmah, Najib and Co.. The mamak is the invisible hand telling the spineless PM and his wife what to do and how to do it. The mamak is trying to repeat his lies often enough so that they can become truth. Talk about ketuanan Melayu, an Indian muslim is actually running this country behind the scenes. ...

written by arazak, March 13, 2011 12:27:07

They should also ask Jibby's DNA. Who knows. . ., maybe that Specimen Y up Sayfool's arsehole was Jibby's (inserted during one of the nights Sayfool visited him).
But Jibby needs to provide the specimen by wanking himself in public as he is the one who said "rakyaat di dahulukan"! The people need to see his DNA sample!

written by NanoNano, March 13, 2011 12:11:50

Give DNA sample... die. Don't give DNA... also die. If me was DSAI... just refuse to give the sample even if forced to. Whatever DSAI does, they wiil try their darndest to put him away. You see they cannot afford to lose the next and future GEs.

written by FreeAsian, March 13, 2011 12:06:23

Is the prosecution still looking for evidence at this late stage, when it should already have had sufficient evidence to allow it to charge Anwar in the first place? Weird rule of law here. Only in Malaysia...

written by educationist, March 13, 2011 11:56:31

Can some legal mind please give us rakyat the implication of such an application?

1. Shitfool did not shit for 2 days and DNA of Y + half a football team was found in his anus/rectum or whatever.

Of course we know who the UMNOputras want to pin DNA of Y to who.

So, can the defence dispute the DNA collection process of that Judais chap?

2. Now, i understand why the defence was allowed the small victory over the illegal evidence collection. Assumning the UMNOputra judicial circus to kick in, can the kangaroo court ruling be appealed[not that it will make much difference to the final result]? ...

written by Ocassey, March 13, 2011 11:41:56

With the on-goings spreading all over the North-eastern African Nations and the nations on the right and left sides of the Red Sea plus the nations at the Southern edges of the Arabian Peninsular ------

AND HERE IN MALAYSIA the powers that be BLATANTLY DARE CONTINUE THIS CHARADE TO NAIL THE NATION'S REFORMASI LEADER WITH WAVE AFTER WAVE OF TRUMPED UP CHARGES AND COURT PROCEEDINGS TO CONSTANTLY EVEN TO DENY HIM RECESSES TO BREATHE FOR DEAR LIFE !!!!

LEADERS OF THIS NATION PORTRAY THEMSELVES TO BE VERY PIOUS AND OF HIGH MORALE BUT THEY ARE ACTUALLY LUCIFERS IN HUMAN FORM ! WE SHALL WAIT FOR THE DOMINO EFFECT FROM EGYPT !!!! DSAI's "CRUCIFIXION " MAY BE THE "SPARK" WE HAVE LONG BEEN WAITING

FOR ! ..

written by SiHangChai, March 13, 2011 11:39:17

Justice is blind. From the 2 unknown DNA found from Saifoo's 3 day shit-hole which was never disclose in previous Anwar's hearing, it was very conclusive that UMNO and polis are trying to set-up Anwar. But obviously, my conclusion is that Saifool is a real gay having 2 unknown DNA found. SO why Saifool was not charged by MAIS or JAWI is a question. Also the untold evident of Saifool's underwear taken from her ex-girlfriend house can generalise that 'berkhalwat' has happened between Saifool and his ex. So why JAWI & MAIS still sleeping and ignore of its existence. Where is the champion of the religion guru such as the Mufti of Perak or Nazri 'the great taxi king" minister have to say? Why Hishamuddin is staying away when he is the Home Minister, and the truth fact is that he supported DSAI more than his cousin, Najib?

The fact the 3 vidences tendered by prosecutor - towek, brush and mineral bottle could though the court has ruled these as evidences show how desperate the UMNO and the polis will do to kill off DSAI even by trying to cheat and planting evidences.

The fact DSAI still have the Dato Seri title clearly shows the Sultan knew something is not right with the polis. The fact the mamok king, Tun M too scared to appear in court shows he has a hand in the latest case against DSAI with Najib.

Wll, just put DSAI into jail for life and stop wasting rakyat monies to have phoney trial and already decide 'guilty' verdict on DSAI. ...

written by Merdeka, March 13, 2011 11:31:07

Rosmah, Najib & Co., tells the Judge off! This what we wants you to do and you have no choice but compel with it!

See how powerful is this evil forces? We are in the dark society.

written by batsman, March 13, 2011 10:11:22

This is a case of accuse and charge even before any damning evidence is legally collected. The court is now manipulated to convict an innocent victim. This also points to the high possibility that a conspiracy is being played out to falsely accuse the victim.

written by batsman, March 13, 2011 10:07:50

The fact that foreign DNA are found in someone's rectum does not automatically prove sodomy occured. There are other possibilities that cannot be discounted, one of which is tainted and contaminated DNA from a dirty source was inserted into the rectum.

The fact that DNA from several persons were found in the rectum alludes to this fact that contaminated DNA was harvested from some other place and inserted into the rectum. ..

written by hellosunshine, March 13, 2011 09:35:29

I really don't know how you guys all feel but I am really fed up to my eyeballs with all these charades and wayang kulit being played out by the gomen and AG/prosecution persecution, wasting time and the taxpayers' money over a damn idiotic 'crime' of sodomy. WTF! Enough aredy!!! ..

written by malsia1206, March 13, 2011 09:08:37

The courts has to take into account "in the interests of justice" before such an application is granted. In this case,the Prosecution's interests are to serve their political masters, and it goes back to Tun Mahathir. This is a political conspiracy. The whole case is contaiminated with politics. Justice is last on the mind of the prosecution. All Malaysians know this fact. This trial is not about sodomy. It's not about Anwar. It's all about the survival of UMNO. ...

written by Stupid me, March 13, 2011 08:40:44

Can also apply to recall the 'victim' and ask him what is he now doing for a living. Someone must be supporting 9his friend?) or is he making a living somewhere else. ...

written by singhkris, March 13, 2011 08:38:15

Very compelling arguments and reasons. Judge cannot ignore. I regret to say. ...

written by michatan2000, March 13, 2011 08:14:30

The government is now openly telling the judge what to do instead of whispering softly into his ears. Now they want open evidence when at the beginning they did not give the defense team their list of witnesses and evidences. The AG and the prosecutor are blatantly flouting the justice system in Malaysia. Sure to hurt the Najis and BN for sure. ...

written by ZamZamAlaKazam, March 13, 2011 07:27:53

... just shows how much better they are going about this this time around. And DSAI will walk into it